Skip to main content

TAWC Jurisprudence and Case Notes

Search This Blog

Attention!!

September 09, 2019

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

This is my website for jurisprudence and case notes. Under case notes, my digests include laws to serve as quick references to the legal basis.

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Manila Prince Hotel vs. GSIS

Case: Manila Prince Hotel vs. GSIS Subject Matter: Environment and Natural Resources Petitioner: Manila Prince Hotel Respondents: GSIS Summary: 1. Ubi jus ibi remedium - As long as there is a right, there is a remedy. Art. 12, Sec. 10 (2) is self-executory because there is a right being upheld or granted. 2. Cultural heritage - The Constitutional Commission considered cultural heritage as a part of our national patrimony. 3. State action - Any act that is considered as a state action is mandated to adhere to the constitution. Facts: Petitioner is a Filipino Corporation that wanted to acquire 51% of shares from the bidding conducted by the respondents in its implementation of privatization of government-owned corporations such as Manila Hotel Corporation. Manila Hotel Corporation is the owner of Manila Hotel – a establishment that has become a part of the Filipino’s historical heritage. In the bidding of shares, petitioner was defeated at first by Rehong Barhad, ...

Del Monte vs. CA et. al.

Title: Del Monte Corporation vs. CA et.al. Subject Matter: Intellectual Property Petitioner: Del Monte Corporation and Philippine Packing Corporation Respondent: Court of Appeals and Sunshine Sauce Manufacturing Industries Summary: 1. Difference between Infringement and Unfair Competition – It is essential in infringement that there is prior registration of the trademark while in unfair competition, it is not necessary. In the case, the bottle’s design has no prior registration because it has a supplemental register which does not confer exclusive rights to the petitioner. However, the use of the bottle constitutes unfair competition because there is fraudulent intent. 2. In the eyes of generic consumers – In infringement, general confusion must be viewed in the lenses of a generic consumer. A generic consumer normally don’t put a great deal of care when purchasing mass produced items such as catsup. In addition, he or she cares more about the cost of the product. 3. P...

GSIS vs. CSC and Dr. Manuel Baradero and GSIS vs. CSC and Matilde S. Belo

Subject Matter: Social Legislation Petitioner: GSIS Respondent: CSC, Dr. Manuel Baradeo and Matilde S. Belo Summary: 1. Powers of the GSIS – The power to determine what service is creditable for retirement solely belongs to GSIS. CSC‘s power to accredit government service is merely ministerial. 2. Liberal Construction of the laws – In cases where the law invoked is clear, unequivocal and leaves no room for interpretation or construction, liberal construction can’t be applied because it will defeat the purpose of the law. 3. Per diem - The law is clear to exclude per diem in the definition of compensation. Facts: G SIS advised CSC that it cannot grant the retirement benefits of Dr. Manel Baradeo and Matilde Belo because they failed to meet the 15-year retirement benefit requirements. However, CSC insist that both are entitled to retirement benefits. Dr. Manuel Baradeo was a government employee who occupied the position Medical Officer IV in PMC u...

Powered by Blogger